[swift-evolution] [Proposal] Refining Identifier and Operator Symbology

Rob Mayoff mayoff at dqd.com
Thu Oct 20 14:30:36 CDT 2016

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Jonathan S. Shapiro via swift-evolution <
swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:

> Quick poll as a sanity check on a possible alternative for operators:
> If we admitted [:Sm:] and [:So:] and the traditional ASCII operator
> characters, would that cover the things that people currently feel
> passionate about? That would almost certainly be compliant with UAX31 once
> it settles, and I *think* it covers all of the cases people have raised
> here.
> Useful links if you want to check:
> [:Sm:]  Symbol, Math
> <http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/category/Sm/list.htm>
> [:So:]   Symbol, Other
> <http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/category/So/list.htm>
This would define both ∞ and ∅ as operators.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20161020/769f69bc/attachment.html>

More information about the swift-evolution mailing list