[swift-evolution] [Proposal] Refining Identifier and Operator Symbology
me at benrimmington.com
Fri Oct 21 07:20:28 CDT 2016
> On 20 Oct 2016, at 15:29, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> Quick poll as a sanity check on a possible alternative for operators:
> If we admitted [:Sm:] and [:So:] and the traditional ASCII operator characters, would that cover the things that people currently feel passionate about? That would almost certainly be compliant with UAX31 once it settles, and I think it covers all of the cases people have raised here.
I'd exclude [:So:], arrows, brackets and "Miscellaneous Mathematical Symbols B".
- [:name=EMPTY SET:]
Is there a property to test for "pictographic" characters?
More information about the swift-evolution