[swift-evolution] [Pre-Proposal-Discussion] Union Type - Swift 4

[Wallacy]

You don't need to act like a jerk. It's really difficult ask to you follow
the past discussions?

Compositions type are "generally" well accepted for this community, but has
some problems to be solved first.


Em qui, 11 de ago de 2016 às 02:53, Cao, Jiannan via swift-evolution <
swift-evolution at swift.org> escreveu:

> OK. I'll shut up since I waste your time.
>
> At 2016-08-11 13:41:59, "Chris Lattner" <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> You’re certainly welcome to your opinion.
>
> Swift is not Typescript, and this topic has been discussed extensively in
> the past.  We expect you to familiarize yourself with those discussions.
> Otherwise, it is just a waste of people’s time to rehash old arguments.
>
> -Chris
>
> On Aug 10, 2016, at 10:22 PM, Cao, Jiannan <frogcjn at 163.com> wrote:
>
> Swift evolution seems not an evolution.
>
> I'll leave this mail list since this is not a good proposal environment.
> Typescript and other language community is more open to new idea.
> Swift-evolution is just a weird community.
>
> 在 2016-08-11 13:18:54，"Chris Lattner" <clattner at apple.com> 写道：
>
>
> On Aug 10, 2016, at 8:15 PM, Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution <
> swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>
> I don't know if the core team feels differently now with respect to Swift
> 4, but union types are listed as a "commonly rejected change":
>
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/commonly_proposed.md
>
>
> There is no change in opinion here.  This topic is also out of scope for
> Swift 4 stage 1 in any case.
>
> -Chris
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160811/86400053/attachment.html>