[swift-evolution] continuations - "extensions on steroids" idea

[BJ Homer]

Again, though, “anyone” here only means “anyone working in the same module”. Which is a very restricted set of “anyone”: it only includes people who already have full access, and could just modify the original struct anyway.

-BJ

> On Nov 1, 2017, at 9:28 AM, Mike Kluev via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1 November 2017 at 15:22, Adam Kemp <adam.kemp at apple.com <mailto:adam.kemp at apple.com>> wrote:
> I don’t see why “parts” would need to be named. That seems overly complex for little benefit. 
> 
> 
> name and ledger are essential in this proposal.
> 
> no name -> 
> no ledger (how to reference it?) -> 
> anyone can write parts of your class -> 
> anyone can add variables to your class ?! -> 
> anyone can access private members of your class ?! 
> 
> makes no sense without a name and a ledger.
> 
> Mike
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20171101/6c70e22f/attachment.html>