[swift-evolution] Proposal: Remove the "fallthrough" keyword
Chris Lattner
clattner at nondot.org
Sun Jan 22 17:15:43 CST 2017
> On Jan 20, 2017, at 12:22 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Yeah, maybe there's a more general language feature that could replace 'fallthrough' here. Instead
>> of labelling cases, we could support a 'reswitch' statement that redispatches the switch to the case
>> matching the operand:
>>
>> switch some_value {
>> case .REFINED:
>> if !validate(some_value) { return NULL }
>> reswitch .BASE
>>
>> case .BASE:
>> handle_enum_value();
>> }
>
> We should just call a spade a spade and spell that "goto" ;-)
Goto has traditionally been used for unstructured control flow, but this form is still fully structured. You cannot produce irreducible loops, jump into scopes, over declarations, etc.
-Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20170122/287c76d6/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list