[swift-evolution] [Accepted with Revision] SE-0088: Modernize libdispatch for Swift 3 naming conventions
clattner at apple.com
Fri May 20 00:28:18 CDT 2016
On May 19, 2016, at 10:26 PM, Dan Appel <dan.appel00 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, I am in full support then. Thanks for being patient here!
No problem at all, thanks!
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:23 PM Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com <mailto:clattner at apple.com>> wrote:
> On May 19, 2016, at 10:17 PM, Dan Appel <dan.appel00 at gmail.com <mailto:dan.appel00 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> > >Because it means that there is exactly one API: not a canonical API and a similar-but-different and less efficient wrapper.
> > Fair enough.
> > >The approach taken here generalizes to other (similarly structured) C APIs as well.
> > I don't see any mention of this in the proposal. Is this related to the other C api translation proposal?
> Yes, this is basically a “review libdispatch’s adoption of SE-0044 and other recent features” proposal.
> > >Why not do it?
> > Well, I want "equal opportunity" for all libraries.
> I agree.
> Dan Appel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-evolution