[swift-evolution] [Accepted with Revision] SE-0088: Modernize libdispatch for Swift 3 naming conventions

Dan Appel dan.appel00 at gmail.com
Fri May 20 00:26:42 CDT 2016


Well, I am in full support then. Thanks for being patient here!

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:23 PM Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:

> On May 19, 2016, at 10:17 PM, Dan Appel <dan.appel00 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >Because it means that there is exactly one API: not a canonical API and
> a similar-but-different and less efficient wrapper.
> >
> > Fair enough.
> >
> > >The approach taken here generalizes to other (similarly structured) C
> APIs as well.
> >
> > I don't see any mention of this in the proposal. Is this related to the
> other C api translation proposal?
>
> Yes, this is basically a “review libdispatch’s adoption of SE-0044 and
> other recent features” proposal.
>
> > >Why not do it?
> >
> > Well, I want "equal opportunity" for all libraries.
>
> I agree.
>
> -Chris
>
> --
Dan Appel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160520/8f534d77/attachment.html>


More information about the swift-evolution mailing list