<div dir="ltr">Well, I am in full support then. Thanks for being patient here!</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:23 PM Chris Lattner <<a href="mailto:clattner@apple.com">clattner@apple.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">On May 19, 2016, at 10:17 PM, Dan Appel <<a href="mailto:dan.appel00@gmail.com" target="_blank">dan.appel00@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> >Because it means that there is exactly one API: not a canonical API and a similar-but-different and less efficient wrapper.<br>
><br>
> Fair enough.<br>
><br>
> >The approach taken here generalizes to other (similarly structured) C APIs as well.<br>
><br>
> I don't see any mention of this in the proposal. Is this related to the other C api translation proposal?<br>
<br>
Yes, this is basically a “review libdispatch’s adoption of SE-0044 and other recent features” proposal.<br>
<br>
> >Why not do it?<br>
><br>
> Well, I want "equal opportunity" for all libraries.<br>
<br>
I agree.<br>
<br>
-Chris<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><div dir="ltr">-- <br></div><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div>Dan Appel<br></div></div></div></div>