[swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0069: Mutability and Foundation Value Types

[Rod Brown]

Tony,

With regard to this proposal, is there any reason that this proposal did not include an OrderedSet value type? I suspect perhaps this is an oversight?

- Rod

> On 4 May 2016, at 1:50 PM, Rod Brown via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> 
> I believe this would fall in line with by Proposal SE-0069: Mutability and Foundation Value Types:
> 
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0069-swift-mutability-for-foundation.md <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0069-swift-mutability-for-foundation.md>
> 
> I notice there is no OrderedSet in this proposal. I find it odd that it doesn’t yet include it.
> 
> - Rod
> 
> 
> 
>> On 4 May 2016, at 1:24 PM, Nicholas Maccharoli via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Swift Community,
>> 
>> Recently I have noticed that there is a Set type but no OrderedSet type yet.
>> If I want a set that preserves the original order I have to go with NSOrderedSet 
>> but I think it would be nice to have a native implementation in the standard library. 
>> 
>> What are your thoughts on this?
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> - Nick
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160504/392e6d71/attachment.html>