[swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0069: Mutability and Foundation Value Types
rodney.brown6 at icloud.com
Wed May 4 06:59:53 CDT 2016
With regard to this proposal, is there any reason that this proposal did not include an OrderedSet value type? I suspect perhaps this is an oversight?
> On 4 May 2016, at 1:50 PM, Rod Brown via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> I believe this would fall in line with by Proposal SE-0069: Mutability and Foundation Value Types:
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0069-swift-mutability-for-foundation.md <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0069-swift-mutability-for-foundation.md>
> I notice there is no OrderedSet in this proposal. I find it odd that it doesn’t yet include it.
> - Rod
>> On 4 May 2016, at 1:24 PM, Nicholas Maccharoli via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>> wrote:
>> Hello Swift Community,
>> Recently I have noticed that there is a Set type but no OrderedSet type yet.
>> If I want a set that preserves the original order I have to go with NSOrderedSet
>> but I think it would be nice to have a native implementation in the standard library.
>> What are your thoughts on this?
>> - Nick
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-evolution