[swift-evolution] [Draft]: Introducing a striding(by:) method on 3.0 ranges

[Wallacy]

Just as note, i think the sintax should be:

0...9
0..<9
0>..9
0>.<9

Because the intention is produce a number bigger than 0 (start). So greater
than zero less than nine.



Em sex, 8 de abr de 2016 22:50, Michel Fortin via swift-evolution <
swift-evolution at swift.org> escreveu:

> Le 8 avr. 2016 à 14:37, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution <
> swift-evolution at swift.org> a écrit :
> >
> > (0 ... 9).striding(by: -2) == [9, 7, 5, 3, 1]
>
> The above reads wrong to me. The expression has to be read differently
> depending on the tinny detail that is the sign of the step that comes last:
>
> * positive step: from 0 to 9 striding by 2
> * negative step: to 0 from 9 striding by -2
>
> Am I the only one thinking it's a bit too clever to swap the start and
> stop parts like this?
>
> --
> Michel Fortin
> https://michelf.ca
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160409/f7288838/attachment.html>