[swift-evolution] Analysis of case conventions for initialisms
dabrahams at apple.com
Fri Feb 12 04:15:55 CST 2016
Did you realize you've dropped the mailing list from the recipient list?
on Fri Feb 12 2016, Xiaodi Wu <xiaodi.wu-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> Based on the examples, #2 does seem to have the most advantages. But:
> what to do with vendor prefixes? Are those to be an exception?
> Another tidbit: .NET seems to have its own exceptions--not sure if
> there are rules for them, but just at the namespace level there's
> System.IO and UIAutomationClientsideProviders, spelled as shown.
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution
> <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>> on Fri Feb 12 2016, Rob Mayoff <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>> I have been using #2 for years in many languages (including Objective-C and
>>> more recently Swift) and much prefer it.
>>> Incidentally, "ASCII" is one of the examples in the definition of "acronym"
>>> in OS X's American English dictionary.
>> Yup, you're right.
>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution <
>>> swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>>> I just posted a write-up about various case conventions for initialisms:
>>>> https://gist.github.com/dabrahams/55fc5ece355da4664730. I was surprised
>>>> at how it turned out, FWIW.
>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org
More information about the swift-evolution