[swift-evolution] Analysis of case conventions for initialisms

[Dave Abrahams]

on Fri Feb 12 2016, Xiaodi Wu <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:

> Based on the examples, #2 does seem to have the most advantages. But:
> what to do with vendor prefixes? Are those to be an exception?

Can you some examples of a “vendor prefix?”

> Another tidbit: .NET seems to have its own exceptions--not sure if
> there are rules for them, but just at the namespace level there's
> System.IO and UIAutomationClientsideProviders, spelled as shown.

Thanks for pointing those out.

>
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution
> <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>
>> on Fri Feb 12 2016, Rob Mayoff <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I have been using #2 for years in many languages (including Objective-C and
>>> more recently Swift) and much prefer it.
>>>
>>> Incidentally, "ASCII" is one of the examples in the definition of "acronym"
>>> in OS X's American English dictionary.
>>
>> Yup, you're right.
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution <
>>> swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I just posted a write-up about various case conventions for initialisms:
>>>> https://gist.github.com/dabrahams/55fc5ece355da4664730.  I was surprised
>>>> at how it turned out, FWIW.
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>
>> --
>> -Dave
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

-- 
-Dave