tanadeau at gmail.com
Wed Jan 6 23:33:46 CST 2016
I completely agree. SwiftDoc is great, and I really appreciate Nate's work
in creating it. It's already very useful and is (IMHO) the prettiest
programming language docs site I've seen.
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Erica Sadun <erica at ericasadun.com> wrote:
> These things are achievable, in my opinion. At a minimum, it's worth
> pinging Nate to have him join in on the discussion rather than trying to
> replace a really great site that already does a large part of what people
> are looking for.
> -- Erica
> On Jan 6, 2016, at 6:19 PM, Trent Nadeau via swift-dev <
> swift-dev at swift.org> wrote:
> SwiftDoc is nice, but it doesn't quite do everything I want. The pages for
> protocols don't list implementing types in the stdlib, and the pages for
> types don't separate the methods by the protocol(s) that require them. Both
> are very useful when using generics so that the developer can create the
> best bounds (i.e., the ones that are least restrictive but still have the
> required operations and semantics).
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 5:44 PM, James Campbell <james at supmenow.com> wrote:
> Trent Nadeau
> swift-dev mailing list
> swift-dev at swift.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-dev