erica at ericasadun.com
Wed Jan 6 20:52:10 CST 2016
These things are achievable, in my opinion. At a minimum, it's worth pinging Nate to have him join in on the discussion rather than trying to replace a really great site that already does a large part of what people are looking for.
> On Jan 6, 2016, at 6:19 PM, Trent Nadeau via swift-dev <swift-dev at swift.org> wrote:
> SwiftDoc is nice, but it doesn't quite do everything I want. The pages for protocols don't list implementing types in the stdlib, and the pages for types don't separate the methods by the protocol(s) that require them. Both are very useful when using generics so that the developer can create the best bounds (i.e., the ones that are least restrictive but still have the required operations and semantics).
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 5:44 PM, James Campbell <james at supmenow.com <mailto:james at supmenow.com>> wrote:
> swiftdoc.org <http://swiftdoc.org/>
> Trent Nadeau
> swift-dev mailing list
> swift-dev at swift.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-dev