[swift-dev] Documentation

[James Campbell]

Wasn't looking to replace but assist by maybe linking to it  and even maybe bringing his repos under the official repo And Nate could still be a contributor

Sent from my iPhone

> On 7 Jan 2016, at 05:33, Trent Nadeau <tanadeau at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I completely agree. SwiftDoc is great, and I really appreciate Nate's work in creating it. It's already very useful and is (IMHO) the prettiest programming language docs site I've seen.
> 
>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Erica Sadun <erica at ericasadun.com> wrote:
>> These things are achievable, in my opinion. At a minimum, it's worth pinging Nate to have him join in on the discussion rather than trying to replace a really great site that already does a large part of what people are looking for.
>> 
>> -- Erica
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jan 6, 2016, at 6:19 PM, Trent Nadeau via swift-dev <swift-dev at swift.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> SwiftDoc is nice, but it doesn't quite do everything I want. The pages for protocols don't list implementing types in the stdlib, and the pages for types don't separate the methods by the protocol(s) that require them. Both are very useful when using generics so that the developer can create the best bounds (i.e., the ones that are least restrictive but still have the required operations and semantics).
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 5:44 PM, James Campbell <james at supmenow.com> wrote:
>>>> swiftdoc.org
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Trent Nadeau
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> swift-dev mailing list
>>> swift-dev at swift.org
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Trent Nadeau
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-dev/attachments/20160107/51280fc7/attachment.html>