[swift-users] dealing with heterogenous lists/dictionary with Codable

[David Sweeris]

Oh! Yeah, my bad... You are correct; I'd started thinking like I was on -evolution instead of -users.


> On Oct 19, 2017, at 1:29 PM, Itai Ferber <iferber at apple.com> wrote:
> 
> Mm, the point I’m trying to get at here is that JSON is inherently untyped while Swift is strongly typed, and the two don’t line up.
> It doesn’t really make sense to ask to decode an existential because there’s not enough type information to influence what you get back.
> 
> On 19 Oct 2017, at 13:20, David Sweeris wrote:
> 
> I think if you can figure that out, you’re halfway to letting protocols conform to themselves.
> 
> (Syntactically, I would probably say that something like “Codable.Self” would read well, but I think that already means something. Maybe the answer will become clearer when we rework the reflection APIs?)
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Oct 19, 2017, at 13:13, Itai Ferber <iferber at apple.com <mailto:iferber at apple.com>> wrote:
> 
>> Even then, that wouldn’t necessarily help in the general case. If you decode {"key" : 1} as [String : Codable], what concrete type would 1 have? Int? Double? Int8? (Arguments can be made for any one of these, but the key here is that it is inherently ambiguous and there isn’t necessarily a good answer.)
>> 
>> On 19 Oct 2017, at 12:57, David Sweeris wrote:
>> 
>> On Oct 19, 2017, at 12:50 PM, David Baraff via swift-users <swift-users at swift.org <mailto:swift-users at swift.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Yes; this is a case where anywhere in the code base I want to just say
>> struct MyNewType : Codable {
>> // add codable datatypes
>> }
>> 
>> and don’t want/can’t always go to the centralized place to add it in.
>> Is there some extension-like trick I can pull off that lets me spread the implementation out over different files/libraries?
>> 
>> Ah, ok.
>> 
>> No, I don't think you'll be able to do that until/unless Swift gets more macro/metaprogramming features. Maybe if protocols ever get to conform to themselves? That's a common request, but implementing it is apparently beyond tricky. I'm pretty sure somebody's working on it, but "bigger fish" and all that...
>> 
>> - Dave Sweeris
>> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-users/attachments/20171019/976f2890/attachment.html>