[swift-users] Can I use a tuple to force a certain memory layout?

[Taylor Swift]

This does not seem to be the case…

    var buffers:(VBO:GL.UInt, EBO:GL.UInt) = (0, 0)
    glGenBuffers(n: 2, buffers: &buffers.VBO)
    print(buffers)
    // > (VBO: 4, EBO: 0)

    var buffers:(VBO:GL.UInt, EBO:GL.UInt) = (0, 0)
    glGenBuffers(n: 1, buffers: &buffers.VBO)
    glGenBuffers(n: 1, buffers: &buffers.EBO)
    print(buffers)
    // > (VBO: 4, EBO: 5)

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Johannes Weiß <johannesweiss at apple.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> > On 20 Jul 2017, at 5:41 pm, Taylor Swift <kelvin13ma at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Does addressof count as legally observing it?
> >
> >         var buffers:(GL.UInt, GL.UInt) = (0, 0)
> >         glGenBuffers(n: 2, buffers: &buffers.0)
> >
> > Also, I assume Swift performs a swizzle if the tuple is defined in a
> separate module from where the pointer to it is constructed?
>
> yes, that's legal assuming the called function doesn't store the pointer
> and read/write it later.
>
>
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Johannes Weiß <johannesweiss at apple.com>
> wrote:
> > When you can (legally) observe it, tuples in Swift have guaranteed
> standard C-style layout.
> >
> > John McCall confirms this here: https://lists.swift.org/
> pipermail/swift-dev/Week-of-Mon-20170424/004481.html
> >
> > > On 20 Jul 2017, at 4:33 am, Taylor Swift via swift-users <
> swift-users at swift.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Many APIs like OpenGL take arrays where the atomic unit is multiple
> elements long. For example, a buffer of coordinates laid out like
> > >
> > > :[Float] = [ x1, y1, z1, x2, y2, z2, ... , xn, yn, zn ]
> > >
> > > I want to be able to define in Swift (i.e., without creating and
> importing a Objective C module) a struct that preserves the layout, so that
> I can do withMemoryRebound(to:capacity:_) or something similar and treat
> the buffer as
> > >
> > > struct Point
> > > {
> > >     let x:Float,
> > >         y:Float,
> > >         z:Float
> > > }
> > >
> > > :[Point] = [ point1, point2, ... , pointn ]
> > >
> > > The memory layout of the struct isn’t guaranteed, but will the layout
> be guaranteed to be in declaration order if I use a tuple inside the struct
> instead?
> > >
> > > struct Point
> > > {
> > >     let _point:(x:Float, y:Float, z:Float)
> > >
> > >     var x:Float
> > >     {
> > >         return self._point.x
> > >     }
> > >
> > >     var y:Float
> > >     {
> > >         return self._point.y
> > >     }
> > >
> > >     var z:Float
> > >     {
> > >         return self._point.z
> > >     }
> > > }
> > >
> > > This is an ugly workaround, but I can’t really think of any
> alternatives that don’t involve “import something from Objective C”. I am
> aware that the implementation of structs currently lays them out in
> declaration order, but I’m looking for something that’s actually defined in
> the language.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > swift-users mailing list
> > > swift-users at swift.org
> > > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users
> >
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-users/attachments/20170720/ab2ff6e5/attachment.html>