[swift-users] Make getting a random number more intuitive

[Erica Sadun]

For some reason, when we were trying to test this the other day in irc, srandom()/random() weren't available (dunno why, because googling for linux man pages shows it should be), which is why we fell back to rand/srand.

-- E

> On Jan 21, 2016, at 2:24 PM, Jens Alfke <jens at mooseyard.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jan 21, 2016, at 1:00 PM, Erica Sadun via swift-users <swift-users at swift.org <mailto:swift-users at swift.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> * In terms of cross-platform random numbers, there are any number of third party libraries and you can use rand() on many platforms
> 
> rand() is deprecated because it uses a poor algorithm that doesn’t provide enough randomness. From the random(3) man page:
> 
>      The random() and srandom() functions have (almost) the same calling
>      sequence and initialization properties as the rand(3) and srand(3) func-
>      tions.  The difference is that rand(3) produces a much less random
>      sequence -- in fact, the low dozen bits generated by rand go through a
>      cyclic pattern.  All of the bits generated by random() are usable.  For
>      example, `random()&01' will produce a random binary value.
> 
> I’d forgotten that random()s sidekick function srandomdev() seeds the RNG with a cryptographic source of entropy, making it usable for secure purposes. So these would be good functions to implement a Swift RNG with.
> 
> —Jens

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-users/attachments/20160121/d193d02a/attachment.html>