[swift-server-dev] HTTP Parser

[Logan Wright]

Chris, that sounds great. Let's do the 21st at 1pm (eastern) that seems to
have the most people possible. Let me know if I can help w/ the webex!

- Logan

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 12:35 PM Chris Bailey <BAILEYC at uk.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi Logan:
>
> If its going to be the 21st, we should probably get the URLs set up and
> the announcements out today.
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> From:        Logan Wright <logan at qutheory.io>
> To:        Chris Bailey/UK/IBM at IBMGB
> Cc:        Paulo Faria <paulo at zewo.io>, swift-server-dev at swift.org
> Date:        15/11/2016 16:54
> Subject:        Re: [swift-server-dev] HTTP Parser
>
>
>
> Chris,
>
> That sounds perfect, webex has been a great format so far. Right now it's
> looking like 12 eastern time on the 21st or the 23rd.
>
> - Logan
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:32 AM Chris Bailey <*BAILEYC at uk.ibm.com*
> <BAILEYC at uk.ibm.com>> wrote:
> Thanks for setting this up. I've filled out the Doodle Poll - do you
> need/want me to set up a Webex once we've determined the day/time?
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> From:        Logan Wright via swift-server-dev <
> *swift-server-dev at swift.org* <swift-server-dev at swift.org>>
> To:        Paulo Faria <*paulo at zewo.io* <paulo at zewo.io>>
> Cc:        *swift-server-dev at swift.org* <swift-server-dev at swift.org>
> Date:        11/11/2016 03:07
> Subject:        Re: [swift-server-dev] HTTP Parser
> Sent by:        *swift-server-dev-bounces at swift.org*
> <swift-server-dev-bounces at swift.org>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Good catch Paulo, fixed, make sure to double check your selections in case
> it moved any of them on you.
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:03 PM Paulo Faria <*paulo at zewo.io*
> <paulo at zewo.io>> wrote:
> I think on Tue 22 the first choice shouldn’t be there? For my timezone it
> says 2AM and right next to it there’s a 2PM.
>
>
> On Nov 11, 2016, at 12:57 AM, Logan Wright via swift-server-dev <
> *swift-server-dev at swift.org* <swift-server-dev at swift.org>> wrote:
>
> Hey everyone, I think it's about time we do some of the http sub-team
> kickoff. We can discuss some of the topics in here and more generally start
> breaking off.
>
> Here's the doodle for interested. We're shooting for the week of the 21st.
> We'll also collect minutes for those who can't make it.
>
> *http://doodle.com/poll/e2tffhkaergtd72p*
> <http://doodle.com/poll/e2tffhkaergtd72p>
>
> - Logan
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:48 AM Tyler Cloutier via swift-server-dev <
> *swift-server-dev at swift.org* <swift-server-dev at swift.org>> wrote:
> Additionally, we are proposing using the Node.js, C language, HTTP parser
> which has been tested in thousands upon thousands of currently deployed
> applications so the likelihood of errors would be much lower than for a
> home grown solution.
>
> That being said I do appreciate the desire to be inclusive of developers
> who might not be familiar with C. Not to mention the benefits of safety
> provided by Swift. I just think in this case since the proposed parser is
> so well tested and widely use, it would be the safer option to choose that.
>
> Tyler
>
>
> > On Nov 8, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Jean-Daniel via swift-server-dev <
> *swift-server-dev at swift.org* <swift-server-dev at swift.org>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Le 7 nov. 2016 à 16:46, James Lei via swift-server-dev <
> *swift-server-dev at swift.org* <swift-server-dev at swift.org>> a écrit :
> >>
> >> if HTTP Parser in C is use along with Swift, it may be difficult for
> the Startups and Enterprise to adopt as an early adopters if something will
> break, it would be difficult for the developers to debug if it's cause by C
> or Swift.
> >>
> >> I favour writing in Swift from scratch to encourage software engineers
> and the like to participate on the same languages from .Net, Java, Node.js,
> Go, Rust community, etc
> >>
> >> Who will be our early adopters?
> >
> > If the primary users are the frameworks authors, I’m pretty sure the
> final users won't care if the low level stuff are C wrappers or a pure
> swift as long as it work out of the box and they can deploy and use the
> framework easily.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > swift-server-dev mailing list
> > *swift-server-dev at swift.org* <swift-server-dev at swift.org>
> > *https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev*
> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-server-dev mailing list
> *swift-server-dev at swift.org* <swift-server-dev at swift.org>
> *https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev*
> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-server-dev mailing list
> *swift-server-dev at swift.org* <swift-server-dev at swift.org>
> *https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev*
> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-server-dev mailing list
> *swift-server-dev at swift.org* <swift-server-dev at swift.org>
> *https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev*
> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev>
>
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-server-dev/attachments/20161118/99f3a17e/attachment.html>