[swift-server-dev] HTTP Parser

[Wayne N]

Tyler Cloutier,

Proposing Node.js HTTP in C would need some benchmark for a comparison
which I assume it would be slower than native Node.js and Perfect using
HTTP in C.

https://medium.com/@rymcol/linux-ubuntu-benchmarks-for-server-side-swift-vs-node-js-db52b9f8270b#.hori7khr1

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Logan Wright via swift-server-dev <
swift-server-dev at swift.org> wrote:

> Chris,
>
> That sounds perfect, webex has been a great format so far. Right now it's
> looking like 12 eastern time on the 21st or the 23rd.
>
> - Logan
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 9:32 AM Chris Bailey <BAILEYC at uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for setting this up. I've filled out the Doodle Poll - do you
>> need/want me to set up a Webex once we've determined the day/time?
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From:        Logan Wright via swift-server-dev <
>> swift-server-dev at swift.org>
>> To:        Paulo Faria <paulo at zewo.io>
>> Cc:        swift-server-dev at swift.org
>> Date:        11/11/2016 03:07
>> Subject:        Re: [swift-server-dev] HTTP Parser
>> Sent by:        swift-server-dev-bounces at swift.org
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> Good catch Paulo, fixed, make sure to double check your selections in
>> case it moved any of them on you.
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:03 PM Paulo Faria <*paulo at zewo.io*
>> <paulo at zewo.io>> wrote:
>> I think on Tue 22 the first choice shouldn’t be there? For my timezone it
>> says 2AM and right next to it there’s a 2PM.
>>
>>
>> On Nov 11, 2016, at 12:57 AM, Logan Wright via swift-server-dev <
>> *swift-server-dev at swift.org* <swift-server-dev at swift.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hey everyone, I think it's about time we do some of the http sub-team
>> kickoff. We can discuss some of the topics in here and more generally start
>> breaking off.
>>
>> Here's the doodle for interested. We're shooting for the week of the
>> 21st. We'll also collect minutes for those who can't make it.
>>
>> *http://doodle.com/poll/e2tffhkaergtd72p*
>> <http://doodle.com/poll/e2tffhkaergtd72p>
>>
>> - Logan
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:48 AM Tyler Cloutier via swift-server-dev <
>> *swift-server-dev at swift.org* <swift-server-dev at swift.org>> wrote:
>> Additionally, we are proposing using the Node.js, C language, HTTP parser
>> which has been tested in thousands upon thousands of currently deployed
>> applications so the likelihood of errors would be much lower than for a
>> home grown solution.
>>
>> That being said I do appreciate the desire to be inclusive of developers
>> who might not be familiar with C. Not to mention the benefits of safety
>> provided by Swift. I just think in this case since the proposed parser is
>> so well tested and widely use, it would be the safer option to choose that.
>>
>> Tyler
>>
>>
>> > On Nov 8, 2016, at 11:26 PM, Jean-Daniel via swift-server-dev <
>> *swift-server-dev at swift.org* <swift-server-dev at swift.org>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> Le 7 nov. 2016 à 16:46, James Lei via swift-server-dev <
>> *swift-server-dev at swift.org* <swift-server-dev at swift.org>> a écrit :
>> >>
>> >> if HTTP Parser in C is use along with Swift, it may be difficult for
>> the Startups and Enterprise to adopt as an early adopters if something will
>> break, it would be difficult for the developers to debug if it's cause by C
>> or Swift.
>> >>
>> >> I favour writing in Swift from scratch to encourage software engineers
>> and the like to participate on the same languages from .Net, Java, Node.js,
>> Go, Rust community, etc
>> >>
>> >> Who will be our early adopters?
>> >
>> > If the primary users are the frameworks authors, I’m pretty sure the
>> final users won't care if the low level stuff are C wrappers or a pure
>> swift as long as it work out of the box and they can deploy and use the
>> framework easily.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > swift-server-dev mailing list
>> > *swift-server-dev at swift.org* <swift-server-dev at swift.org>
>> > *https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev*
>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-server-dev mailing list
>> *swift-server-dev at swift.org* <swift-server-dev at swift.org>
>> *https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev*
>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-server-dev mailing list
>> *swift-server-dev at swift.org* <swift-server-dev at swift.org>
>> *https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev*
>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-server-dev mailing list
>> swift-server-dev at swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
>> 741598.
>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-server-dev mailing list
> swift-server-dev at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-server-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-server-dev/attachments/20161117/2b4bb725/attachment.html>