[swift-evolution] Property Selectors
jaden.geller at gmail.com
jaden.geller at gmail.com
Tue Mar 14 05:51:34 CDT 2017
> On Mar 14, 2017, at 1:42 AM, David Sweeris via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>> On Mar 14, 2017, at 01:02, Andrew Thompson via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hello Swift Evolution Community,
>>
>> I’ve been thinking about a new language feature that would allow properties to be first class citizens. The basic idea is as follows:
>>
>> let x: PropertySelector<UIView, CGFloat> = #property(UIView.frame.origin.x)
>> let view: UIView = …
>> view.frame.origin.x = 20
>> x.read(view) // returns 20
>> x.write(view, value: 9091)
>> view.frame.origin.x // now 9091
>>
>> This is a trivial example, but now we can do more interesting things in our code. For example, we can animate any property on a view (that is documented to be animatable of course):
>>
>> func animate(view: UIView, property: PropertySelector<UIView, CGFloat>, amount: Int) {
>> let originalValue = property.read(view)
>> func generateKeyFrames() {
>> let step = 1.0 / Double(amount)
>> for i in 0..<amount {
>> let newValue = originalValue + CGFloat(i)
>> let time = Double(i) / Double(amount)
>> UIView.addKeyframe(withRelativeStartTime: time,
>> relativeDuration: step,
>> animations: { property.write(view, value: newValue) }
>> )
>> }
>> }
>>
>> UIView.animateKeyframes(withDuration: 1.0,
>> delay: 0,
>> options: [],
>> animations: generateKeyFrames,
>> completion: nil)
>> }
>>
>> let myView: UIView = …
>> myView.frame = CGRect(x: 20, y: 100, width: 99, height: 120)
>>
>> // once this completes, myView.frame.origin.x == 120
>> animate(view: myView, property: #property(UIView.frame.origin.x), amount: 100)
>>
>> // once this completes, myView.frame.size.width == 198
>> animate(view: myView, property: #property(UIView.frame.size.width), amount: 99)
>>
>> I think this would be a pretty neat feature to have, what do you think?
>
> I think you can already do that with `UnsafeMutablePointer`. I think. I'm really tired, so maybe if I look at it again in the morning I'll immediately see a difference. Apart from the syntax, of course, which is nice.
You definitely shouldn't try to replicate this with a pointer. At least one place that will break down is computed properties (as well as `didSet` and friends), but I imagine there are more. Also, this sort of operation should not require dropping down to an unsafe construct!
It's worth noting this is sort of equivalent to defining a type that stores functions that, given a type, will get or set a certain property. It would need to be initialized with 2 lambdas though.
>
> -Dave Sweeris
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list