[swift-evolution] Subclass Existentials
mwhiteside.dev at gmail.com
Sun Jan 29 12:37:07 CST 2017
Thanks for writing this proposal David.
> On Jan 29, 2017, at 10:13, Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> As Matthew mentioned, the rules can certainly later be relaxed, but given that this proposal has the compiler generating fix-its for subclasses in second position, is there a reason other than stylistic for demanding MyClass & MyProtocol instead of MyProtocol & MyClass?
> From a naive perspective, it seems that if the compiler understands my meaning perfectly, it should just accept that spelling rather than complain.
I had that thought too. Since ‘and’ is a symmetric operation, requiring the class to be in the first position seems counter-intuitive.
More information about the swift-evolution