[swift-evolution] Swift evolution proposal: introduce typeprivate access control level

[Robert Widmann]

The proposal, as it stands, does nothing to indicate how this is much different from internal - all examples given would trivially be solved by internal members.  I don’t think we need finer-grained access control to address this, I think we need extensions, at least in the same file as their parent declarations, to be able to define variables.

> On Nov 29, 2016, at 10:24 AM, Gonçalo Alvarez Peixoto via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello, everyone!
> 
> I would like to introduce a new proposal to swift evolution, but first I would love to run it by all of you so I get everyone's feedback and enrich it.
> 
> This proposal consists of introducing a new typeprivate access control level which allows for members to be accessed in all extensions of a given type, whether lying within or in another file.
> 
> You'll find the proposal draft in:
> https://github.com/goncaloalvarez/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/NNNN-introduce-typeprivate-access-control-level.md <https://github.com/goncaloalvarez/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/NNNN-introduce-typeprivate-access-control-level.md>
> 
> Thanks in advance for taking the time to evaluate the proposal.
> 
> Best regards,
> Gonçalo
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20161129/7a3b77f8/attachment.html>