[swift-evolution] [Accepted] SE-0142: Permit where clauses to constrain associated types
Goffredo Marocchi
panajev at gmail.com
Thu Oct 6 03:09:11 CDT 2016
Not to start an argument, but I am more concerned about how we go about avoiding the Swift 3.0 issue where a bunch of accepted proposals did not make the implementation cut and were not all automatically dragged on the next release, but would have essentially to be discussed and agreed upon again. Please do tell me if I misunderstood something here, I apologise if so.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 12 Nov 2016, at 08:40, Adrian Zubarev via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>
> Accepted for which release? Swift 3.1 or Swift 4.0? Thanks.
>
>
>
> --
> Adrian Zubarev
> Sent with Airmail
>
> Am 6. Oktober 2016 um 01:19:54, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution (swift-evolution at swift.org) schrieb:
>
>> Proposal Link: https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0142-associated-types-constraints.md
>>
>> Hello Swift Community,
>>
>> The review of SE-0142 "Permit where clauses to constrain associated types” ran from September 23…30, 2016. Feedback on this proposal was overwhelmingly positive. The proposal is accepted.
>>
>> - Doug
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20161006/91a948a7/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list