[swift-evolution] [Late Pitch] Deprecations, Moves, and Renames
Dave Abrahams
dabrahams at apple.com
Tue Aug 9 18:36:55 CDT 2016
on Tue Aug 09 2016, Ben Rimmington <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>> On 9 Aug 2016, at 20:09, Dave Abrahams wrote:
>>
>> Hi Everybody,
>>
>> With another round of apologies for taking late action, we propose to
>
>> make some deprecations, moves, and renames. The background for these
>> moves is as follows:
>>
>> We've always known that when Swift reached ABI stability (now slated for
>> Swift 4), we would be committed to supporting many of the standard
>> library's design decisions for years to come. What we only realized
>> very recently is that, although Swift 3.0 is *not* shipping with a
>> stable ABI, the promise that Swift 3.0 code will work with Swift 4.0
>> code creates similar implications when it comes to certain protocols,
>> today. Especially where these protocols show up in refinement
>> hierarchies, we can't keep Swift 3 code working in the future without
>> carrying them forward into future libraries.
>>
>> The proposed changes are as follows:
>>
>> * Move `CustomPlaygroundQuickLookable` to the PlaygroundSupport module.
>> This component is really only useful for playgrounds, and doesn't
>> belong in the standard library.
>
> I didn't think it was possible to `import PlaygroundSupport` unless the
> current file is within a playground. If so, how can corelibs-foundation
> or third-party modules add `CustomPlaygroundQuickLookable`
> conformance?
Ahhh... yeah, I didn't realize that, and we don't have time to change
that restriction for Swift 3. It's not a problem for
corelibs-foundation but it would be for 3rd-party libraries.
OK, Dmitri and I just figured out how we can change the home of these
types for Swift 4 without breaking Swift 3 code (mirrors to the rescue!)
So I'm going to withdraw this part of the proposal.
>> * Deprecate the Indexable protocols with a message indicating that they
>> will be gone in Swift 4. These protocols are implementation details
>> of the standard library designed to work around language limitations
>> that we expect to be gone in Swift 4. There's no reason for anyone to
>> ever touch these; users should always use a corresponding Collection
>> protocol (e.g. instead of MutableIndexable, use MutableCollection).
>>
>> * Deprecate the ExpressibleByStringInterpolation protocol with a
>> message indicating that its design is expected to change. We know
>> this protocol to be mis-designed
>> (https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1260) and limited
>> (https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-2303), but there's no time to fix it
>> for Swift 3. If we knew what the new design should look like, we
>> might be able to calculate that the current API is supportable in a
>> forward-compatible way (as we do for Comparable). Unfortunately, we
>> do not.
>>
>> * Rename Streamable to TextOutputStreamable and add a deprecated
>> Streamable typealias for it. Now that OutputStream been renamed to
>> TextOutputStream, we should also move Streamable out of the way.
>>
>> Deprecation is being proposed instead of underscoring or renaming
>> because it allows existing code to keep working (with warnings). At
>> this late stage, it would be bad to actually break anything.
>
> If the SE-0104 (protocol-oriented integers) proposal has been deferred,
> should any protocols (e.g. SignedNumber) be deprecated?
>
> -- Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
--
-Dave
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list