[swift-evolution] [Late Pitch] Deprecations, Moves, and Renames

Dave Abrahams dabrahams at apple.com
Tue Aug 9 16:57:34 CDT 2016

on Tue Aug 09 2016, Karl <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:

>> On 9 Aug 2016, at 21:09, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>> Hi Everybody,
>> With another round of apologies for taking late action, we propose to
>> make some deprecations, moves, and renames.  The background for these
>> moves is as follows:
>> We've always known that when Swift reached ABI stability (now slated for
>> Swift 4), we would be committed to supporting many of the standard
>> library's design decisions for years to come.  What we only realized
>> very recently is that, although Swift 3.0 is *not* shipping with a
>> stable ABI, the promise that Swift 3.0 code will work with Swift 4.0
>> code creates similar implications when it comes to certain protocols,
>> today.  Especially where these protocols show up in refinement
>> hierarchies, we can't keep Swift 3 code working in the future without
>> carrying them forward into future libraries.
>> The proposed changes are as follows:
>> * Move `CustomPlaygroundQuickLookable` to the PlaygroundSupport module.
>>  This component is really only useful for playgrounds, and doesn't
>>  belong in the standard library.
>> * Deprecate the Indexable protocols with a message indicating that they
>>  will be gone in Swift 4.  These protocols are implementation details
>>  of the standard library designed to work around language limitations
>>  that we expect to be gone in Swift 4.  There's no reason for anyone to
>>  ever touch these; users should always use a corresponding Collection
>>  protocol (e.g. instead of MutableIndexable, use MutableCollection).
>> * Deprecate the ExpressibleByStringInterpolation protocol with a
>>  message indicating that its design is expected to change.  We know
>>  this protocol to be mis-designed
>>  (https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1260) and limited
>>  (https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-2303), but there's no time to fix it
>>  for Swift 3.  If we knew what the new design should look like, we
>>  might be able to calculate that the current API is supportable in a
>>  forward-compatible way (as we do for Comparable).  Unfortunately, we
>>  do not.
>> * Rename Streamable to TextOutputStreamable and add a deprecated
>>  Streamable typealias for it.  Now that OutputStream been renamed to
>>  TextOutputStream, we should also move Streamable out of the way.
>> Deprecation is being proposed instead of underscoring or renaming
>> because it allows existing code to keep working (with warnings).  At
>> this late stage, it would be bad to actually break anything.
>> -- 
>> -Dave
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> Does this include the ContiguousArray deprecation? 

Definitely not.

> I’m still seeing performance issues with regular Array (will update
> bug soon).
> I don’t mind if it gets deprecated, so long as it isn’t removed before we sort those issues out.
> Otherwise +1
> Karl
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution


More information about the swift-evolution mailing list