[swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0136: Memory Layout of Values
razielim at gmail.com
Sun Aug 7 20:03:55 CDT 2016
> * What is your evaluation of the proposal?
Although if I was nitpicking I prefer the name “ofInstance” (as in the stdlib private function) to “ofValue”.
What is the standard nomenclature? Whereas I would distinguish between “objects/instances” and “values”, I’ve started referring to all Swift things as “objects” and “instances”, even if they are value types.
> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a
> change to Swift?
> * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of
> * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar
> feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
I think the metatype system needs revising for Swift >3.0, but given time constraints this is the best solution
> * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a
> quick reading, or an in-depth study?
Followed prior discussion, read proposal
> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
> Thank you,
> Dave Abrahams
> Review Manager
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
More information about the swift-evolution