[swift-evolution] [Draft][Proposal] Formalized Ordering

Xiaodi Wu xiaodi.wu at gmail.com
Thu Jul 21 20:19:04 CDT 2016

This is nice. Is `areSame()` being proposed because static `==` is the
status quo and you're trying to make the point that `==` in the future need
not guarantee the same semantics?

Nit: I think the more common term in stdlib would be `areEquivalent()`. Do
you think `same` in that context (independent of the word "ordering") might
erroneously suggest identity?

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Robert Widmann via swift-evolution <
swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:

> Hello Swift Community,
> Harlan Haskins, Jaden Geller, and I have been working on a proposal to
> clean up the semantics of ordering relations in the standard library.  We
> have a draft that you can get as a gist.
> <https://gist.github.com/CodaFi/f0347bd37f1c407bf7ea0c429ead380e>  Any
> feedback you might have about this proposal helps - though please keeps
> your comments on Swift-Evolution and not on the gist.
> Cheers,
> ~Robert Widmann
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160721/4afbd35f/attachment.html>

More information about the swift-evolution mailing list