<div dir="ltr">This is nice. Is `areSame()` being proposed because static `==` is the status quo and you're trying to make the point that `==` in the future need not guarantee the same semantics?<div><br><div>Nit: I think the more common term in stdlib would be `areEquivalent()`. Do you think `same` in that context (independent of the word "ordering") might erroneously suggest identity?</div><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 8:11 PM, Robert Widmann via swift-evolution <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org" target="_blank">swift-evolution@swift.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div>Hello Swift Community,</div><div><br></div><div>Harlan Haskins, Jaden Geller, and I have been working on a proposal to clean up the semantics of ordering relations in the standard library. We have a draft that you can <a href="https://gist.github.com/CodaFi/f0347bd37f1c407bf7ea0c429ead380e" target="_blank">get as a gist.</a> Any feedback you might have about this proposal helps - though please keeps your comments on Swift-Evolution and not on the gist.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div><br></div><div>~Robert Widmann</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
swift-evolution mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org">swift-evolution@swift.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>