[swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0121: Remove `Optional` Comparison Operators

T.J. Usiyan griotspeak at gmail.com
Tue Jul 12 21:56:49 CDT 2016


+1

Conditional conformance cannot arrive soon enough.

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Ash Furrow via swift-evolution <
swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:

> * What is your evaluation of the proposal?
>
> +1 from me. I particularly like how this adheres to the principle of least
> surprise. Keeping == and != is an important part of the proposal, as others
> have said.
>
> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to
> Swift?
>
> I believe so.
>
> * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
>
> Aye, pretty happy about its direction.
>
> * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature,
> how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
>
> I have: Objective-C! Converting the code from the proposal, we have:
>
> NSArray *ps = [peeps filter:^BOOL(Person *lhs, Person *rhs) {
>   return [[lhs pet] age] < [[rhs pet] age];
> }];
>
> I think that convention works in Objective-C, nil being capable of
> receiving messages is a cornerstone of the language. But Swift has
> discouraged the convention of calling functions directly on nil, through
> Optionals. I believe that removing the comparison operators for Optionals
> adheres to the same ideas that Optionals themselves are built from.
>
> * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading,
> or an in-depth study?
>
> I read the review thoroughly, asked on Twitter, let it sit in the back of
> my head for an hour. I also had to spend five minutes figuring out the Objective-C
> block syntax for a filter function.
>
> --
> Ash Furrow
> https://ashfurrow.com/
>
> On July 12, 2016 at 2:26:55 PM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution (
> swift-evolution at swift.org) wrote:
>
> Hello Swift community,
>
> The review of "SE-0121: Remove `Optional` Comparison Operators" begins now
> and runs through July 19. The proposal is available here:
>
>
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0121-remove-optional-comparison-operators.md
>
> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews
> should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at
>
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the
> review manager.
>
> What goes into a review?
>
> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review
> through constructive criticism and contribute to the direction of Swift.
> When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer
> in your review:
>
> * What is your evaluation of the proposal?
> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to
> Swift?
> * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
> * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature,
> how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
> * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading,
> or an in-depth study?
>
> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
>
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md
>
> Thank you,
>
> -Chris Lattner
> Review Manager
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160712/f48849db/attachment.html>


More information about the swift-evolution mailing list