[swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0117: Default classes to be non-subclassable publicly
tseitz42 at icloud.com
Tue Jul 12 00:12:14 CDT 2016
+1 for the feature, +0.5 for being it the default and -1 for they syntax.
I'd prefer `open`, maybe `public(open)` or probably better `public open`.
I think library design is important and so this is a problem worth solving. I read the proposal and followed the discussion.
> Am 06.07.2016 um 01:11 schrieb Chris Lattner via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org>:
> Hello Swift community,
> The review of "SE-0117: Default classes to be non-subclassable publicly" begins now and runs through July 11. The proposal is available here:
> Reviews are an important part of the Swift evolution process. All reviews should be sent to the swift-evolution mailing list at
> or, if you would like to keep your feedback private, directly to the review manager.
> What goes into a review?
> The goal of the review process is to improve the proposal under review through constructive criticism and contribute to the direction of Swift. When writing your review, here are some questions you might want to answer in your review:
> * What is your evaluation of the proposal?
> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to Swift?
> * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
> * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
> * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
> Thank you,
> -Chris Lattner
> Review Manager
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
More information about the swift-evolution