[swift-evolution] [Pitch] Importing Objective-C 'id' as Swift 'Any'
Chris Lattner
clattner at apple.com
Sat Jul 2 11:39:34 CDT 2016
> On Jul 2, 2016, at 1:20 AM, Goffredo Marocchi <panajev at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey Chris,
>
> Do you have plans to allow people to update Swift outside Xcode 8 point updates and still be able to submit to the App Store and benefit from the IDE's features? This could allow bug fixes to be delivered on a swifter way and take advantage of the fact that iOS is not including the runtime yet.
We don’t discuss Xcode future direction on the Swift lists, even though there is often overlap with the future of Swift. OTOH, the future and direction of Swift is totally on topic for these lists.
-Chris
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 2 Jul 2016, at 06:21, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 1, 2016, at 9:11 PM, David Waite via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1!
>>>
>>> To me, it feels like the ambivalent dynamic casting is a temporary complexity, and that at some point in the future the need to expose legacy reference types like NSString outside swift-supplied or user-created bridging code will disappear completely.
>>>
>>> This also will get rid of some of the rough edges in the various corelibs where value types cannot be supported because some platforms have a backing library written in Objective-C. Swiftier indeed!
>>>
>>> Is this something you are pushing for in Swift 3? It seems appropriate but ambitious.
>>
>> Yes, we’re trying for it. “Appropriate but ambitious” is an accurate assessment - this is a huge stretch by the entire team but Swift 3 is the right time for it.
>>
>> -Chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list