[swift-evolution] Thoughts on replacing \() with $() or some other symbol

Adrian Zubarev adrian.zubarev at devandartist.com
Wed Jun 22 11:27:20 CDT 2016


This also depends on the keyboard layout you have. I mean looking at the English keyboard layout the \ character is presented and easily accessible with just a single tap.

For me it’s always been a problem, this is not a strong argument for changing that behavior but it would ease at least my workflow.

Shift + CMD + 7 == \ for my German keyboard layout.



-- 
Adrian Zubarev
Sent with Airmail

Am 22. Juni 2016 um 18:21:10, Jeremy Pereira via swift-evolution (swift-evolution at swift.org) schrieb:


> On 22 Jun 2016, at 17:02, Brandon Knope <bknope at me.com> wrote:
>  
> No it shows where your hand frequently is also

And you don’t think there is a correlation between where the frequently pressed keys are and where your hands are? If you were needing to press the \ key a lot, there would be a hotspot over it. Then you could say “look, I need to press this key a lot and it’s miles away from the other hotspot”.  

>  
> Brandon
>  
>> On Jun 22, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Jeremy Pereira <jeremy.j.pereira at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>  
>>  
>>> On 22 Jun 2016, at 16:41, Brandon Knope <bknope at me.com> wrote:
>>>  
>>> My point was not to argue for the removal of \. My point was that there is a measurable way to test the usability of such a key
>>  
>>  
>> Your heat map doesn’t test the usability of a key, it tests the frequency with which it was pressed. The fact that there was no coloured blob on the backslash key just means you don’t use it very often.
>>  
>>  
>>>  
>>> Brandon
>>>  
>>>> On Jun 22, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Jeremy Pereira <jeremy.j.pereira at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>  
>>>> I find it somewhat disturbing that we are now trying to base language design around the layout of a US English keyboard.
>>>>  
>>>> “\” on my keyboard (British Macbook Pro Retina) is right next to the return key. It’s also much closer to the parentheses characters than $ is and (if you assume we are going to replace parentheses with braces as was suggested upthread) right next to the brace keys.  
>>>>  
>>>> Anyway, your heat map evidence actually negates the argument. If it was a frequently used key, it would have a hot spot of its own. It’s not (I tried it on some random samples of my own code), so that implies it is not a key that is used very often, which further implies it *should* be a little out of the way.
>>>>  
>>>> *The* escape character for strings is “\”. Please let’s not introduce a second one.
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>> On 22 Jun 2016, at 00:08, Brandon Knope via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>>>>  
>>>>> Actually… we can go pretty scientific on this sort of thing and heat map keyboard usage to get a better picture of how “usable” this is.
>>>>>  
>>>>> I pasted a file that contains seven \’s in it and heat mapped it at https://www.patrick-wied.at/projects/heatmap-keyboard/
>>>>>  
>>>>> Even *with* several \’s throughout my source file the majority of my key presses take place much closer to the $ key than the \ key.
>>>>>  
>>>>> I think we can all argue about what is clearer or not, but I think for the majority of us, the \ key is quite inconvenient compared to the keys around where we type the most.
>>>>>  
>>>>> I also ran several of iOS 10’s sample code through the heat map and continue to get pretty similar results: the \ is much further from the hottest part of the keyboard than the ones closer to where your hand usually rests.
>>>>>  
>>>>> Maybe this is flawed, but I think it is hard to argue that the \ is easy to type when there are far more usable alternatives.
>>>>>  
>>>>> Brandon
>>>>>  
>>>>>  
>>>>>  
>>>>>> On Jun 21, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Daniel Resnick via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> I also disagree for the same reasons that Gwynne and Brent mentioned: I find '\(...)' easy to read, fine to type, and consistent with other string escaping syntax.
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> I find that typing \(var) is very disruptive to my typing flow. The more I code in Swift, the more I like it, but every time I'm coding and then have to hiccup while typing \ then ( causes me to be annoyed. I know, it's minor, but it isn't a key combination that flows quickly.
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> I would much rather have $() or perhaps ${} (like Groovy lang) or perhaps @() to go along with other uses of @ throughout the language.
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> Even though I'm used to Perl's and Ruby's interpolation syntaxes, I immediately liked `\(…)`. It's parsimonious: Rather than taking a third character (besides \ and ") to mean something special in a string literal, it reuses one of the existing ones. There's no need to escape a character you wouldn't otherwise have to touch, or to think of another character as "magical" in a string. It fits nicely with the rest of the syntax, with `\` indicating a special construct and then `()` delimiting an expression, just as they do elsewhere in the language. It's an elegant solution to a problem traditionally solved inelegantly. It's very Swifty in that way.
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> A shifted key, like $ or @, followed by another shifted key like (, allows for a much faster flow and they are much closer to the home keys than \ which is nearly as far from home keys as possible (and awkward).
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> I don't have any trouble typing it personally. If you find yourself accidentally typing `\9` or `|(`, we could probably offer an error for the former or warning for the latter with a fix-it. But if you're complaining that it takes a tiny fraction of a second longer to type than `$(` would, then honestly, I just can't bring myself to care. Swift optimizes for code reading. If we wanted to optimize for code typing instead, we'd have a very different style.
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Brent Royal-Gordon
>>>>>> Architechies
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>>>>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>>>>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>>>>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>>>>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>>>>  
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>>>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>>>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>>>  
>>>  
>>  
>  

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution at swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160622/0588fede/attachment.html>


More information about the swift-evolution mailing list