[swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0077: Improved operator declarations

Антон Жилин antonyzhilin at gmail.com
Thu Jun 9 13:31:06 CDT 2016

I'm starting to worry about the proposal, too. Any news?

- Anton

2016-05-31 1:07 GMT+03:00 Антон Жилин <antonyzhilin at gmail.com>:

> I assume that Core team is scheduling a discussion or already discussing
> the proposal, and that really takes time in our case.
> In reply to Brent, I think that we can start requiring `public` if (when?)
> operator visibility levels are added.
> - Anton
> 2016-05-24 13:53 GMT+03:00 Brent Royal-Gordon <brent at architechies.com>:
>> > > Can you qualify them with module names?
>> > Right now, I guess, no, although that would be nice to have. I agree
>> that this can be discussed later.
>> I wonder if we should force people today to put a `public` keyword on
>> their `operator` and `precedence` (or whatever) declarations, so that when
>> we eventually *do* stop doing the weird global thing we're currently doing,
>> existing code won't break (as much).
>> --
>> Brent Royal-Gordon
>> Architechies
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160609/de43d6e8/attachment.html>

More information about the swift-evolution mailing list