[swift-evolution] [Review #2] SE-0089: Renaming String.init<T>(_: T)
jtbandes at gmail.com
Sat Jun 4 15:46:01 CDT 2016
(updating my evaluation of the first version of this proposal)
> * What is your evaluation of the proposal?
- I believe the default/generic "printing" initializer is not commonly
used (at least, not on purpose).
- The new argument label clearly indicates what the initializer does.
- The "lossless" protocol will be a welcome addition for
serialization/deserialization code, and it makes the replacement init(_:)
API very clear in its behavior.
> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a
> change to Swift?
> * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
Yes, it fits well with the API guidelines.
> * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar
> feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
> * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick
> reading, or an in-depth study?
Reviewed the initial proposal, followed and participated in the ensuing
discussion, and glanced at this second draft to remind myself of the final
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-evolution