<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div>(updating my evaluation of the first version of this proposal)</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">        <a href="https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0089-rename-string-reflection-init.md" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0089-rename-string-reflection-init.md</a><br><br>
        * What is your evaluation of the proposal?<br></blockquote><div style="font-size:12.8px"><br></div><div style="font-size:12.8px">+1, because:</div><div style="font-size:12.8px">  - I believe the default/generic &quot;printing&quot; initializer is not commonly used (at least, not on purpose).</div><div style="font-size:12.8px">  - The new argument label clearly indicates what the initializer does.</div><div>  - The &quot;lossless&quot; protocol will be a welcome addition for serialization/deserialization code, and it makes the replacement init(_:) API very clear in its behavior.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
        * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to Swift?<br></blockquote><div>Yes.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
        * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?<br></blockquote><div>Yes, it fits well with the API guidelines.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
        * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?<br></blockquote><div>N/A</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
        * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?<br></blockquote><div>Reviewed the initial proposal, followed and participated in the ensuing discussion, and glanced at this second draft to remind myself of the final changes.</div><div><br></div><div>- Jacob</div></div></div></div>