[swift-evolution] [swift-evolution-announce] [Review] SE-0089: Replace protocol<P1, P2> syntax with Any<P1, P2>
Dave Abrahams
dabrahams at apple.com
Thu May 26 12:11:52 CDT 2016
on Thu May 26 2016, Adrian Zubarev <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> There is great feedback going on here. I'd like to consider a few things here:
>
> * What if we name the whole thing `Existential<>` to sort out all
> confusion?
Some of us believe that “existential” is way too theoretical a word to
force into the official lexicon of Swift. I think “Any<...>” is much
more conceptually accessible.
>
> This would allow `typealias Any = Existential<>`. * Should
> `protocol A: Any<class>` replace `protocol A: class`? Or at least
> deprecate it. * Do we need `typealias AnyClass = Any<class>` or do we
> want to use any class requirement existential directly? If second, we
> will need to allow direct existential usage on protocols (right now we
> only can use typealiases as a worksround).
--
Dave
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list