[swift-evolution] [Proposal] Disallow redundant `Any<...>` constructs

[Adrian Zubarev]

Isn’t `Any` a typealias for `any<>`?  If so, we have to support `any<>`! :)
Yes it is and SE-0095 will cause that all types implicitly conform to empty any<>.

This still can be banned from any<any<>, A> because its useless and redundant. But is up to the core team to decide.


-- 
Adrian Zubarev
Sent with Airmail
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160520/7c0b0e4e/attachment.html>