<html><head><style>body{font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px}</style></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;"><div id="bloop_customfont" style="font-family:Helvetica,Arial;font-size:13px; color: rgba(0,0,0,1.0); margin: 0px; line-height: auto;"><div><div><blockquote type="cite" class="clean_bq" style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><span style="font-family: 'helvetica Neue', helvetica;">Isn’t `Any` a typealias for `any<>`? If so, we have to support `any<>`! :)</span></blockquote></div></div><p>Yes it is and SE-0095 will cause that all types implicitly conform to empty any<>.</p><p>This still can be banned from any<any<>, A> because its useless and redundant. But is up to the core team to decide.</p><div><br></div></div> <div id="bloop_sign_1463772177199582976" class="bloop_sign"><div style="font-family:helvetica,arial;font-size:13px">-- <br>Adrian Zubarev<br>Sent with Airmail</div></div></body></html>