[swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0091: Improving operator requirements in protocols
me at lmpessoa.com
Wed May 18 16:00:25 CDT 2016
> Hello Swift community,
> The review of "SE-0091: Improving operator requirements in protocols" begins now and runs through May 23. The proposal is available here:
> * What is your evaluation of the proposal?
Allow for consistent code when implementing operators. I'd go a bit
further and say any operator functions should be declared like this
but this seems to be the case for another proposal.
> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to Swift?
> * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
> * If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
Yes. In C# operator overloading is done exactly like this (but also
only like this).
> * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
A quick reading.
More information about the swift-evolution