[swift-evolution] SE-0025: Scoped Access Level, next steps

[Ilya Belenkiy]

Maybe it's good thing that we just discussed it. After replying to Matthew,
this meaning private feels so wrong that I will update  the proposal
to disallow this. Private should mean private.

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 7:27 AM Brent Royal-Gordon <brent at architechies.com>
wrote:

> > We already had a very long discussion about all of these topics.
>
> I am not suggesting you change the design. I am suggesting you clarify the
> description of your existing design so that everyone understands what it
> means, because confusion is rampant.
>
> > I'd like to keep "private" to be completely private and not allow class
> injection to gain access, but this is an edge case that could be argued
> either way. I can definitely live with a pure scoped access  for
> consistency and don't want to argue the edge case in a never ending
> discussion.
>
>
> So what you're saying is, you are purposefully writing the proposal
> vaguely so that everyone can assume it says whatever they imagine it says,
> and thus more people will support the proposal?
>
> This is no way to design a programming language.
>
> --
> Brent Royal-Gordon
> Architechies
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160328/2bb3247f/attachment.html>