[swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0042 Flattening the function type of unapplied method references

[Matthew Johnson]

> 	• What is your evaluation of the proposal?

+1.  This is a great proposal, especially for the functional use cases mentioned in the motivation section.

> 	• Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to Swift?

Yes.  It makes functional use cases more clunky than necessary.

> 	• Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?

Very much so. 

> 
> 	• How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?

I followed the initial discussion on the list and have been looking forward to this proposal.

> 
> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at:
> 
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md>
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> -Chris
> Review Manager
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160319/d31f7867/attachment.html>