[swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0042 Flattening the function type of unapplied method references
Patrick Gili
gili.patrick.r at gili-labs.com
Thu Mar 17 14:08:42 CDT 2016
>
> • What is your evaluation of the proposal?
This is consistent with removing curried functions from Swift, and hence I'm in favor of it; consistency is good.
> • Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to Swift?
Yes.
> • Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
Yes.
> • If you have used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
Well, it feels like many modern languages are going the opposite direction; that is, incorporating more functional programming. I think Swift's approach is more programmatic though.
> • How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
Read thoroughly.
>
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list