[swift-evolution] [DRAFT] Introducing a Debug Build Configuration Test
Shawn Erickson
shawnce at gmail.com
Tue Mar 15 11:20:35 CDT 2016
You would likely want to ensure debug related code could be optimized away
/ or not be included in release builds. I am not sure how a function would
achieve that.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 9:15 AM Erica Sadun via swift-evolution <
swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 14, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Erica,
>
> Based on Joe's rationale that you are quoting, I think the intent is
> that we want to restrict this directive to be statement-level only.
> The API vended by a module should not be affected by the build mode.
>
> Dmitri
>
>
>
> Could the debug build test take the form of a standard non-private
> function then
> instead of _isDebugAssertConfiguration()? If the test is limited to
> methods,
> introducing #if-style tests would be ugly.
>
> How likely or easy is it for me to reframe the request for testing for
> debug to be as
> simple as:
>
> `if debugBuild() {...}`
>
> with `debugBuild` vended by the standard library instead of as a build
> configuration test?
>
> -- E
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160315/3a04cec0/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list