[swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0025 Scoped Access Level

[Ilya Belenkiy]

By the same logic, the comment alone is enough, the private keyword isn't
necessary. The benefit of scoped is that the intent would be enforceable by
the compiler.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:48 PM Joseph Lord via swift-evolution <
swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:

> On Feb 26, 2016, at 7:05 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution <
> swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>
> The review of SE-0025 “Scoped Access Level" begins now and runs through
> March 3, 2016. The proposal is available here:
>
>
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0025-scoped-access-level.md
>
>
> -0.1
> There is nothing wrong with this proposal but I just don't see the value
> over private (plus a little doc comment if absolutely necessary).
>
> Downside is more language to learn / encounter and complexity to maintain.
>
> I've read the proposal but not the preceding discussion.
>
> Joseph
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160227/b0d6ba56/attachment.html>