[swift-evolution] [Idea] Make Boolean @objc properties reflect better into Objective-C

[Jordan Rose]

+1 from me.

> On Feb 23, 2016, at 13:00, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> The Swift API guidelines state that Boolean properties should reflect assertions about the receiver, so in Swift one would expect:
> 
> 	class Foo {
> 	  var isEnabled: Bool // good
> 	}
> 
> rather than
> 
> 	class Foo {
> 	  var enabled: Bool // not Swifty
> 	}
> 
> When the property is @objc, e.g.,
> 
> 	class Foo : NSObject {
> 	  @objc var isEnabled: Bool
> 	}
> 
> The resulting Objective-C property doesn’t follow the Cocoa guidelines for Objective-C <https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/CodingGuidelines/Articles/NamingIvarsAndTypes.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/20001284-BAJGIIJE>:
> 
> 	@property (readwrite,nonatomic) BOOL isEnabled;
> 
> because those guidelines state that properties do not use the “is” prefix.
> 
> My proposal is to strip the “is” prefix from the Objective-C name, but leave it off the getter, e.g.,
> 
> 	@property (readwrite,nonatomic,getter=isEnabled) BOOL enabled;
> 
> The change would have no effect on the Swift name; it will only affect the Objective-C property name and setter name.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> 	- Doug
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160223/c29067be/attachment.html>