[swift-evolution] Proposal: Pattern Matching Partial Function (#111)

Paul Ossenbruggen possen at gmail.com
Wed Feb 3 00:03:18 CST 2016


Agreed. I really would like this to move forward.


> On Feb 2, 2016, at 6:59 PM, Denis Nikitenko via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> 
> +1 from me - I would like to see this discussion continue.  Swift already recognizes the utility of pattern matching for initialization by retaining the ?: operator.  It would be nice to see a more general and flexible solution that is still reasonably concise and doesn’t introduce new keywords and operators - though I’m sure at least some changes to the language would be inevitable.  
> 
> 
>> On Jan 29, 2016, at 1:43 AM, Craig Cruden via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> The following proposal apparently was not considered widely enough discussed since it was “buried” in a 400 message discussion thread that meandered before coming to the final draft.
>> 
>> As such, to have it reopened — I am restarting the discussion in a new thread to ensure wider discussion.
>> 
>> 
>> https://github.com/cacruden/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0024-Pattern-Matching-Partial-Function.md <https://github.com/cacruden/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0024-Pattern-Matching-Partial-Function.md>
>> 
>> 
>> Pattern Matching Partial Function
>> 
> 
> <snip>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160202/ce4ed1f9/attachment.html>


More information about the swift-evolution mailing list