[swift-evolution] [swift-evolution-announce] [Review] Replace `typealias` keyword with `associatedtype` for associated type declarations
jnosh at jnosh.com
Sun Jan 3 07:42:51 CST 2016
> On 03 Jan 2016, at 07:38, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote:
> * What is your evaluation of the proposal?
I am in favor of this for the same reasons mentioned by the previous reviewers.
> * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to Swift?
> * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift?
I think so.
> * If you have you used other languages or libraries with a similar feature, how do you feel that this proposal compares to those?
I am only aware of Rust and I haven't used that enough to make any meaningful comparisons.
> * How much effort did you put into your review? A glance, a quick reading, or an in-depth study?
I read the proposal and followed the previous threads discussing the proposal and the keyword.
Speaking of which, `associatedtype` remains my favorite. I don't think its ideal but I prefer it to the alternatives that were considered.
> More information about the Swift evolution process is available at
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/process.md>
> Doug Gregor
> Review Manager
> swift-evolution-announce mailing list
> swift-evolution-announce at swift.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-evolution