[swift-evolution] Introduce "associated_type" keyword

[Loïc Lecrenier]

Great :)

Also, this hasn't been explicitly discussed yet. But do you all agree about adding "real" typealias declarations (with the typealias keyword) inside protocols? 

Loïc

> On Dec 6, 2015, at 3:20 AM, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Stephen Celis via swift-evolution
> <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>> On Dec 5, 2015, at 8:11 PM, Kevin Lundberg via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> If we must keep this concept, I would prefer something without an underscore for the keyword, like "associatedtype" or perhaps "typeassociation"
>> 
>> Or merely "associated".
> 
> +1 to the proposal, emphasizing the distinction is important; and I
> like "associated" as the keyword for this purpose, too.
> 
> Dmitri
> 
> -- 
> main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
> (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/