[swift-dev] [Swift 2.2] Request to merge code completion for #selector
Ted Kremenek
kremenek at apple.com
Tue Feb 2 19:30:06 CST 2016
Hi Doug,
These changes don’t cherry-pick cleanly to swift-2.2-branch.
Please create a pull request for swift-2.2-branch that cherry-picks in these changes and resolves the merge conflicts.
Otherwise, Approved for Swift 2.2.
Ted
> On Feb 2, 2016, at 4:39 PM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ted,
>
> The #selector expression has both a discoverability and a usability problem due to fairly poor code completion. These two changes:
>
> https://github.com/apple/swift/commit/9736d54a771e87cc37be5c040404f6e387f766ec
> https://github.com/apple/swift/commit/f5cb1151c1ba4d8e40705ff31cb17c74c97daa4a
>
> introduce much better code completion for #selector. The first commit makes
>
> #selector(<#@objc method#>)
>
> an expression-specific (i.e., very high priority) completion when code-completing an argument for a parameter of type “ObjectiveC.Selector”, e.g.,
>
> obj.performSelector(<complete here and get #selector(<#@objc method#>)>
>
> while the second provides compound-name completions for method references within a #selector subexpression, e.g.,
>
> #selector(NSObject.<complete here>
>
> will give completions like
>
> performSelector(_:withObject:)
>
> and
>
> init
>
> and so on.
>
>
> - Doug
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-dev/attachments/20160202/061ec39c/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-dev
mailing list